Use case · Consumer brands
You may sell nothing online. You are still being described all day.
When somebody asks an assistant which product to buy in your category, the answer is assembled from retailers, review aggregators and forum threads. Your own site is usually the one source not represented, because it was built to look good rather than to be read.
- 1Someone askswhich is the best one for me?
- 2Assistantgathers whatever it can read
Without you
A reseller listing, a review aggregator, a four-year-old forum thread, a competitor’s comparison page.
With you
Your own specifications, your own claims, your own comparisons, quoted and linked back to you.
What the work is
- Your own product facts, claims and comparisons made readable
- Structured data across the whole catalog, validated on every build
- A monthly record of what the major assistants actually say about you
structured data# Your own facts, where an assistant looks "@type" Product "name" The thing, as you call it "offers" Price and availability, current "review" Yours, not a scraped aggregate # And the check that it is working Monthly: what each major assistant says about you, what changed, and what moved.
Also covers
- CPG & food
- Beauty & personal care
- Apparel
- Household & durables
- Beverage
Is this your situation?
Send the address of the site. The first reply has findings in it, not a calendar link.